Our last account was banned for conducting this male sexual stimulation research experiment. We refuse to let someone’s morals decide what science is allowed. Science should never be hidden and banned from the public under any circumstances.

We are Institution X, an independent project focused on the science of male sexual stimulation, control, and endurance.

To be absolutely clear:

• All participants are 18+.
• Participation is fully voluntary and informed.
• We run our experimental sessions with safety protocols and documented consent.

Some people might find that morally offensive. That’s their right.
But their personal moral discomfort should not be enough to erase discussion of experimental work and censor it for the public. What we reject is the idea that someone’s private moral code – religious, traditional, or ideological – should automatically dictate which forms of scientific research are allowed to exist in public discussion.

We want it on record, publicly and clearly, that our previous account was banned specifically because we described this kind of research. If this profile suddenly disappears as well, let it be understood: it will almost certainly be for the same reason.

Morals vs law vs science

• Morals are personal or cultural beliefs: religious, traditional, or ideological.
• Law is a framework designed (at least in theory) to protect the vulnerable and keep basic order.

We respect the law. We operate within it.
We build our work on consent, safety, and transparency.

What we reject is the idea that:

That is not how science works.
That is how control works.

Throughout history, moral panic has been used to shut down research on:

• sexuality
• the body
• non-standard relationships and identities
• anything that makes people confront how fragile and flexible “normal” really is

Our project is part of that same line:
we explore how far arousal, control, and endurance can be pushed under fully consensual, supervised conditions. Some people will always find that offensive. That does not automatically make it wrong, illegal, or harmful.

Why we’re posting this here

We are not asking everyone to like what we do.
We are not asking you to participate, watch, or approve.

We are saying:

• If you are against it on moral grounds, you are free to look away.
• If you care about scientific freedom and adult bodily autonomy, then moral shock should not be enough to erase projects like this from public conversation.
• If platforms want to forbid explicit description, they should say that clearly as a policy choice, not pretend that consensual research between adults is “harm” by default.

We are posting this here because we believe this subreddit is one of the few places where adult, consensual, experimental work can be discussed honestly. We have never had any issues with the moderators in this community, and we respect the work they do to keep this space functional and sane. Our problem is not with them, but with the broader pattern of moral panic and silent erasure.

Call to action

If you’ve read this far and felt even a small spark of “this should be allowed to exist,” this part is for you.

1. Stop treating personal disgust as a reason to censor. If something involves only informed, consenting adults, your reaction is about you, not an objective danger.
2. Say it out loud when you see this double standard. When platforms and mods (outside of communities like this one) hide behind “safety” to erase adult consensual research, call it what it is: moral control dressed up as protection.
3. Support projects that refuse to sanitize reality. Upvote, comment, and stand behind spaces that keep discussion open about extreme, consensual experimentation instead of pushing it back into the dark.
4. If you are curious, don’t just lurk. Ask hard questions. Challenge us. Make us justify our methods. That’s what real science looks like – not silence, not auto-delete, not “don’t talk about it.”
5. Share this. If you believe that what’s happening here is wrong – that banning a project like this simply for existing and speaking openly is a problem – then share this post. Talk about it. Mirror the text elsewhere. The more people know why an account disappeared, the harder it is to quietly erase the work and pretend it never existed.

We are not going to apologize for existing.
We are not going to pretend this work is anything other than what it is:
a deliberate, structured exploration of male sexual response, control, and endurance between fully consenting adults.

If that offends you, scroll away.

If you think adults should be free to push their own limits and talk about it openly, then stand up for that principle here. If this account or this post disappears, we want it to be absolutely clear why it happened – and we want as many people as possible to remember that it did.